JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 3, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Nestor Raul Correa Henao

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Numeral 1 De La Parte Resolutiva Del Auto Proferido Por El Magistrado Alvaro Tafur Galvis De Rechazo De La Demanda Contra El Articulo 137 (Parcial) De La Ley 100 De 1993. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Desarrollo del concepto de violación
  • No planteamiento de cargo de inconstitucionalidad directo y de naturaleza constitucional
  • Razones claras, ciertas, específicas, pertinentes y suficientes
  • Argumentación debe ser formulada material y formalmente
  • Correspondencia entre el cargo y el supuesto de hecho normativo
  • Formulación de cargo concreto, específico y directo
  • Sustentación específica del concepto de violación
Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda
  • Ausencia de una proposición jurídica real y existente
4 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. CONFIRMAR el auto de fecha ocho (08) de abril de dos mil cinco (2005), por medio del cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el artículo 137 (parcial) de la Ley 100 de 1993, formulada por el ciudadano Néstor Raúl Correa Henao.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.